Über Cerner Ambulatory

PowerChart Ambulatory EHR von Cerner ist eine hybride eGA-Lösung (elektronische Gesundheitsakte), die sich an Klinikärzte in Krankenhäusern und ambulanten Einrichtungen richtet. PowerChart wurde entwickelt, um bei der Erstellung von elektronischen Patientenakten mit mehreren Entitäten zu helfen. Die Lösung kann in der Cloud oder vor Ort bereitgestellt werden. Die Software bietet verschiedene integrierte Vorlagen, die verschiedene Fachgebiete abdecken und so viele verschiedene medizinische Anbieter unterstützen können. PowerChart koordiniert die Pflege zwischen mehreren Standorten und Ärzten, hilft Büromitarbeitenden bei der Verwaltung von Patientenaktenprozessen und bietet dennoch flexible Dokumentationsoptionen. Diese Optionen spiegeln sich in der lösungseigenen Datenbank mit klinischen Datenvorlagen, anpassbaren Verfahrensworkflows und Patientenaktenoptionen wider. PowerChart ist gemäß ONC-ATCB und Meaningful Use Stage 1 und 2 zertifiziert. Das Patientenportal hilft dem Büropersonal bei der Verwaltung der Patientenkommunikation, indem es Terminerinnerungen sendet und Patienten den Onlinezugriff auf ihre Krankenakten ermöglicht. PowerChart Touch ist auch für Gesundheitsdienstleister verfügbar, die über Tablets und Smartphones auf mobile Workflows zugreifen müssen. Cerner bietet Support per Telefon, FAQs und über das Onlinekundenportal von Cerner.
Cerner Ambulatory Software - 1
Cerner Ambulatory Software - 2
Cerner Ambulatory Software - 3
Cerner Ambulatory Software - 4
Cerner Ambulatory Software - 5
Cerner Ambulatory Software - 6
Cerner Ambulatory Video
Cerner Ambulatory Software - 1 - Vorschau
Cerner Ambulatory Software - 2 - Vorschau
Cerner Ambulatory Software - 3 - Vorschau
Cerner Ambulatory Software - 4 - Vorschau
Cerner Ambulatory Software - 5 - Vorschau

Cerner Ambulatory Preis

Cerner Ambulatory bietet keine Gratisversion. Die kostenpflichtige Version von Cerner Ambulatory ist ab $ 25.00/Jahr verfügbar.

Startpreis:
$ 25.00/Jahr
Kostenlose Version:
Nein
Kostenlose Testversion:
Nein

Alternativen für Cerner Ambulatory

EpicCare EMR

EpicCare von Epic Systems ist eine ePA-Lösung (elektronische Patientenakte) für große Krankenhäuser und Gesundheitssyste...

MEDITECH Expanse

MEDITECH EHR ist ein On-Premise-eGA-System (elektronische Gesundheitsakte), das medizinischen Fachkräften in mittelgroße...

Elation Health

Elation Health ist eine cloudbasierte, klinisch ausgerichtete ePA-Lösung (elektronische Patientenakte) für ärztliche...

Cerner Ambulatory Erfahrungen

Funktionsbewertung

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
3.5
Funktionalität
3.6
Bedienkomfort
3.5
Kundenbetreuung
3.6
Miguel
  • Branche: Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen
  • Unternehmensgröße: 10’000+ Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionen
5
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
5

5
Bewertet am 31.3.2021

Functional Software that plays an important role in the healthcare field

Overall, i have had a pleasant experience with this software, it is definitely user friendly and provides healthcare workers a variety of tools that make charting much easier. Also, it is extremely easy to find information about a specific patient due to the fact that it has different sections with up to date information about the patient and that takes off a lot of times from reading the physician's documentation, at least on my current job position. I highly recommend this software!

Vorteile

I work in the healthcare industry and use this tool on a daily basis. The software contains a variety of tools that allow healthcare workers to document patient's visits very easily and it is very user friendly. Moreover, it is an extremely well developed software where you are able to navigate through patient's chart, test results, patient's scheduled visits and many other tools that healthcare providers use to get acquaintance with the personal history of the patient. In regards to my position, the Oncology flowchart provides me with information about the cancer staging, treatment name and dates, BMI and lab results. It is a highly functional tool with multi faceted use.

Nachteile

In order for the software to function correctly, massive amount of updates need to happen monthly from the IT team in my organization. It can be very glitchy sometimes or freeze when there are large amount of information, for example, the MAR section freezes a lot. But other than that, it is highly functional and well developed software.

Ethan
  • Branche: Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen
  • Unternehmensgröße: 5’001–10’000 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4
Funktionen
4
Bedienkomfort
3
Kundenbetreuung
0

4
Bewertet am 29.4.2019

Cerner PowerChart Review

Overal Cerner PowerChart satisfies electronic medical record needs well with a few areas of improvement. I am not involved with EMR purchasing decisions but from what I understand, Cerner PowerChart is a good product for the money.

Vorteile

Cerner PowerChart provides a comprehensive location for all medical information. Information display can be customized to fit user needs and provides quick access to pertinent info with continued use. Home screens are customized for each particular practitioners credentials and needs making many commonly used tasks always right at hand. Accessing information from other visits is also easily performed regardless of which encounter the patient was initially pulled up. One of my favorites is the results callback functionality that allows easy review of discharged patients culture results.

Nachteile

While Cerner is not difficulty to use, not all features are entirely intuitive. Many functions require repeated use and lots of clicking to access and perform relatively simple tasks. While there is a quick link for Meds Manager access for pharmacists, the link does not pull up the current patient profile opened, necessitating re-entering of the patient encounter number which is a bit tedious. Additionally, the disjunction between FirstNet and PowerChart is inconvenient and would be nice if charts opened through FirstNet opened PowerChart rather than a separate entity of FirstNet given the difference in functionality between the two programs.

Nicolas
  • Branche: Psychische Gesundheitsfürsorge
  • Unternehmensgröße: 501–1’000 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
1
Funktionen
1
Bedienkomfort
1
Kundenbetreuung
1

2
Bewertet am 18.10.2016

Extremely poor value for the money

The user experience is completely not user-friendly, often needing ongoing clarification for what are basic searching or to complete basic routine activities. Amazingly poor UX/UI layout, and often confusing. The customer services has been all along a nightmare. For more than two months initially in March 2016 when we wanted to start this system we were forced to keep calling in prescriptions to pharmacies & writing controlled medicines for 5 days because the system wasn't working -and Cerner telling us they didn't know what was the problem. Later on when we were eventually able to e-prescribe non-controlled substances still we were forced to get a NY State waiver for controlled substances because the company couldn't get it resolved in more than a month longer. Worse, they blamed our IT team here when was clear it wasn't the case. This was more frustrating as this was happening while we're busy seen patients. Support was spotty at best, often the IT people been forced to resolve the problems themselves, or improvise, while the agency I'm working was paying Cerner money. Even now (10/18/2016), the e-prescribe system, that claims it has a renewal option for old medications, it doesn't work for controlled substances (some do, some don't) , so many of us have always to re-write as a new prescription all controlled medicines. I'm a psychiatrist but I've also some formal training in UX/UI design, and to write code, so I'm probably better understanding computers than the usual MD, and even for me the system was an impossible crazy task. I also work with other e-prescribe systems in other agencies, and comparing apples to apples, the other systems are much cheaper and much, much better, and very much easier to use. It's amazing how poor service you can get paying big bucks! And here, this is one glaring example. Buyer beware!

Vorteile

Easier to write progress notes.

Nachteile

What I wrote about e-prescribe.

Verifizierter Rezensent
  • Branche: Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen
  • Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionen
4
Bedienkomfort
3
Kundenbetreuung
0

4
Bewertet am 5.3.2019

harder to get used to after using EPIC for EHRs

I learned to use it and I think with more time I will get better as always, but the learning curve was a bit different from EPIC charting which seemed to be more color coded, and easier to navigate, but also full of facility wide things that had to be filled out but didn't apply to the patient, so that was cumbersome.

Vorteile

It is easy to use once you get to know where things are located, but it has more of a windows software feel than a mac software. It is more utilitarian in that it is not colored and the font is small, which is good for efficiency in documenting once you know where things go and are located. Does not have hangups that EPIC has when company wide documenting is required for certain areas that sometimes do not apply to particular patient such as was the case on a pediatric floor where I was using this system and I appreciated not having EPIC.

Nachteile

Hard to get used to. I was coming from using EPIC mostly, which seems easier and more intuitive to learn. I found the smaller black boxes and hidden tabs harder to get used to when trying to document daily things. As a nurse the med administration tab wasn't as easy to use as it is in EPIC and wasn't as intuitive and I sometimes messed up at first in documenting med administration especially when trying to add something that wasn't scanning from the pharmacy and I had to do an override.

Verifizierter Rezensent
  • Branche: Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen
  • Unternehmensgröße: 10’000+ Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
3
Funktionen
3
Bedienkomfort
2
Kundenbetreuung
4

4
Bewertet am 10.10.2018

Cross functional amazing

Vorteile

Everyone could use it to serve the patient the best, from in house staff registering and obtain images of id's or insurance information, to providers to document patient's care and keep reports, to billing departments for insurance verification or printing medical reports. It was a 1 stop shop for medical purposes.

Nachteile

Training was non me, i learned everything on my own. But that could of been a company decision and not a software issue.

Ähnliche Kategorien