Über Mailgun









Mailgun Preis
Mailgun bietet eine Gratisversion und eine kostenlose Testversion. Die kostenpflichtige Version von Mailgun ist ab $ 35.00/Monat verfügbar.
Alternativen für Mailgun
Mailgun Erfahrungen
Funktionsbewertung
- Branche: Lebensmittelproduktion
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Kostenlose Testversion genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Shared IP -> 10% der Mails werde als Spam abgewiesen
Vorteile
Die Einrichtung war super einfach und schnell erledgt.
Nachteile
Sofern man nicht seine eigene IP hat, werden die Mails sehr häufig als Spam abgewiesen. Die Shared-IPs sind werden von vielen missbraucht und sind daher in einigen Listen als Spam-IP aufgelistet.

- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: Selbstständig
- Weitere für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Bare-bones but super reliable and easy to use.
I use several different email service providers, each for a different reason. I use Mailgun almost exclusively for inbound mail processing. The inbound processing also offers a preliminary spam filter so that at least most of the spam isn't sent further down my process chain.
It's super easy to set up inbound routes using specific strings or wildcard matches that will accept mail and forward to multiple different recipients. These recipients can be either proper email addresses or webhook endpoints.
I often use the address forwarders in combination with the SMTP outbound service to build a system where Gmail users can use their free gmail.com account to receive and send emails from their small business domain without having to sign up for and configure a proper G Suite account.
I use the webhook forwarders in combination with Zapier and Integromat to receive any emails that need to be processed and automatically acted on. Mailgun normalizes all the different types of email and attachment encodings and packages the message data into an easy-to-parse JSON package that makes it super easy for me to grab what I need and reliably act on the normalized data.
Vorteile
Inbound mail processing with spam filter
Free tier offers great sending limit
SMTP and API integration for outbound messaging
Nachteile
This product doesn't offer any sort of backend mail building or sending functionality. It's only an engine for sending messages. This means you'll have to build your messages somewhere else and integrate them into your sending code.
- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Mailgun is the most developer friendly and cost-effective transactional email service/
Mailgun was one of the most developer-friendly transactional email service providers previously until they removed their free plan. However, the ease of implementation and support by different plugins and software make it a really good tool. DNS is easy to configure so we have no issue with deliverability. The dashboard is also great and offers good logs and graphs.
Vorteile
Great documentation, 10k emails on the free plan was great previously for the prepaid plan is okay. Good API and interface.
Nachteile
Downtimes and deliverability issues can be daunting.
Warum Mailgun gewählt wurde
Pricing mainly. Maildrill was taken over by MailChimp and pricing got very high.Zuvor genutzte Software
MailchimpGründe für den Wechsel zu Mailgun
Dashboard, ease of implementation, the support team was great too and offered very quick response times.- Branche: Marketing & Werbung
- Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Worst email product and support ever used (RUN AWAY)
Vorteile
sub-accounts management (before getting suspended for no reason)
Nachteile
Mailgun disables your account after 6 months working on integrating with it ; out of nowhere, for no reason.
+ they keep billing you every month (over 600$ at this stage) even though your subscription mentions that you're at 0$/month.
When you're trying to reach out to the support, they close our tickets without even answering, ghosting.
Absolutely WORST product ever used and support team faced, it's absolutely garbage. This goes without saying that Mailgun way of coding emails is terrible, their delivrability is one of the worst of the market.
Do yourself a favor, go to sendgrid. Mailgun SUCKS.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen
SendGridWarum Mailgun gewählt wurde
Mailgun disables your account after 6 months working on integrating with it ; out of nowhere, for no reason. + they keep billing you every month (over 600$ at this stage) even though your subscription mentions that you're at 0$/month. When you're trying to reach out to the support, they close our tickets without even answering, ghosting. Absolutely WORST product ever used and support team faced, it's absolutely garbage. This goes without saying that Mailgun way of coding emails is terrible, their delivrability is one of the worst of the market. Do yourself a favor, go to sendgrid. Mailgun SUCKS.Zuvor genutzte Software
SendGridGründe für den Wechsel zu Mailgun
native CRM integration. A true nightmare until the end. Run away from them!!!- Branche: Telekommunikation
- Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Developer friendly transactional email service
We are solving transactional email needs for a startup I work as a CTO, does a great job there despite pricing not being flexible enough.
Vorteile
Mailgun is a service that was created by developers for developers. Their top-tier documentation and code is self-explanatory and should present no issues to integrate in just a few minutes. The service itself is reliable and has the latest bleeding edge features. Their customer support is very effective and can get issues solved promptly.
Nachteile
Mailgun's pricing has only gotten pricier and pricier with time. They are not even able to provide discounts that are not in their scheme and it is up to you to simply accept that when there are many competitors on this market. The service itself is very robust but this inconvenient made me think about other options after some above-base level features were needed.