Über Shortcut
Clubhouse ist eine cloudbasierte Lösung, mit der Softwareingenieure und -entwickler Probleme über mehrere Projekte hinweg verfolgen und lösen können. Zu den wichtigsten Funktionen gehören Auditing, Problemplanung, Nutzerzugriff und Projektmanagement.
Clubhouse wurde für Unternehmen aller Größen konzipiert und ermöglicht den Nutzern, Projekte zu erstellen, um Fehler zu beheben, die bei der Entwicklung von Anwendungen entdeckt wurden. Die Lösung ermöglicht Unternehmen, Unteraufgaben zu verwalten und den Teammitgliedern zuzuweisen und über den Status von Problemen auf dem Laufenden zu bleiben. Zusätzlich erlauben Kanban-Boards es Firmen, die Drag-and-drop-Schnittstelle zu benutzen, um Projekte basierend auf Kundenanforderungen zu priorisieren.
Clubhouse bietet ein Berichterstattungs-Tool, um den Fortschritt des Teams zu überwachen, und erhält Schätzungen über abgeschlossene Projekte. Das Produkt ermöglicht die Integration mit verschiedenen Anwendungen von Drittanbietern wie GitLab, Slack, Zendesk, Dropbox und weiteren. Das Produkt ist als monatliches Abonnement erhältlich, und der Support wird über Dokumentation und E-Mail erweitert.
Shortcut Preis
Shortcut bietet eine Gratisversion und eine kostenlose Testversion. Die kostenpflichtige Version von Shortcut ist ab $ 10.00/Monat verfügbar.
Alternativen für Shortcut
Shortcut Erfahrungen
Funktionsbewertung
- Branche: Zeitung
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Get up and running in 1 day
Clubhouse is allowing us to capture user stories on the fly, and keep those stories organized. We are able to create custom swim lanes that match our process perfectly, so that the stories can flow from one step to the next easily until they are done. We use the reporting on a daily basis to look at our burndown chart, and to track our stats for each sprint. It is easy to add tasks for each other to complete, and to leave notes and comments for each other within the stories. It helps keep all the communication for each story in one place, and lets us easily see what is going on with them at any point in time. And it's REALLY easy to use, so we actually use it! Also, we love having the Milestones feature where we can keep the big items on our roadmap and easily see our progress towards them. SO much better than having a separate roadmap tool that we never look at. I recommend it to anyone.
Vorteile
We're a scrum team developing software in the news industry. We switched from PivotalTracker to Clubhouse, and the ease of setup and how quickly we were able to learn the product was amazing. It took me weeks to get a grasp of PivotalTracker, but within a morning we were up and running on Clubhouse and loving it. The software looks clean, appealing, and intuitive, and it is so easy to learn and use that you will wonder why you used anything else ever. And the price point is easy to swallow, too. We love it!
Nachteile
Clubhouse is still missing robust sprint related tools. There are great workarounds in place, and they will be releasing those soon, so no hesitation on recommending it. But once they roll those features out it will be even better.
- Branche: Finanzdienstleistungen
- Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Simple to use and provides enough features to run and manage sprints for a small team
Vorteile
- Simple to learn and navigate so the team could quickly start using the product after switching- Love the dark mode and the colour coding of different story types i.e bug, feature or chore so it's easy to see things at the high level- Easy to create sprints and I like the summaries provided on the story points
Nachteile
- You can only write stories in markdown text. Not a big issue since I've become really good at it! But it'd be good if there was a text editor instead- Sometimes when I create a story and I accidentally click out of it, I lose the progress. It'd be good if they had a draft functionality where the stories get created as a draft straight away
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen
JiraWarum Shortcut gewählt wurde
We needed something that was more focused on sprint managementZuvor genutzte Software
NotionGründe für den Wechsel zu Shortcut
JIRA has a quite suite of features however it was too complex for what we were looking for. We need something to track our sprints and features and shortcut was perfect for that.- Branche: E-Learning
- Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Short may be an overstatement for shortcut
Vorteile
This is an adequate task management/tracking software. It has a fantastic Zendesk integration and multiple customizable fields. It also boasts decent search and filtering functions but it isn't particularly user-friendly and filling out all the fields that make it function well takes a great deal of time (hence the title of this review).
Nachteile
There are no AI/smart suggestions for related epic/team fields so every time you make a new ticket you have to search through them by scratch. They also don't offer a great tag database or tag definitions so you have to create naming conventions separately offline. You also can't use rich text in story descriptions.
- Branche: Automotive
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Shortcut (formerly Clubhouse) is a great task management tool for development teams
Vorteile
Before switching to Shortcut, we used Jira. While Jira has plenty of features, we found it a bit cumbersome and the performance of the interface was atrocious (everything single task was incredibly slow, even the most basic activities had a noticeable delay).
The first major benefit we saw with Shortcut was the speed of interaction - instead of waiting for the interface to catch up, we could just log in and get things done.
The integrations with various source control platforms (we use the Gitlab integration) also helps keep task statuses up to date without even having to open the web interface.
Overall the speed of the interface and the available integrations lead to a feeling that Shortcut never "gets in our way".
Nachteile
We started out paying for Shortcut (when it was still called Clubhouse), but were soon switched to a free plan without even having to ask. Although this was a nice gesture on their part, they then released a beta of their new product called Write. This beta is only available for paying users, which is understandable, but having been moved to a free plan meant we couldn't access it. This isn't a major issue, but starting our subscription back up would require going through the approval process with our accounting department again so we've just stayed on the free plan without access to Write so far.
- Branche: Finanzdienstleistungen
- Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Shortcut is a great tool for small companies!
Vorteile
Many of the features of this software are useful to our company. Our team has come to heavily rely on the roadmap view and reporting tools. These features have kept our company on track and increased our velocity in immeasurable ways.
Nachteile
A few of the features our team feels are missing from Shortcut are custom fields and release management. If our team was able to have a reliable release management system, it would be very impactful to our team and customers.
